Presidential Actions
Bills of Congress
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 91โ€“100 of 123 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Speech First, Inc. v. Whitten (No. 24-361)
This document is Justice Thomas's dissent from the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in *Speech First, Inc. v. Whitten*. The case concerns a challenge to Indiana University's (IU) bias response team and its policies regarding the reporting and handling of โ€ฆ This document is Justice Thomas's dissent from the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in *Speech First, Inc. v. Whitten*. The โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (No. 23-971)
The Supreme Court case *Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.* addresses whether a voluntary dismissal of a case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) qualifies as a "final proceeding" under Rule 60(b), which allows courts to relieve โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.* addresses whether a voluntary dismissal of a case without prejudice โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. (No. 23-900)
The Supreme Court case Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. (No. 23-900) addresses the calculation of profits in trademark infringement cases under the Lanham Act. The Court held that a prevailing plaintiff can only recover profits directly attributable to โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. (No. 23-900) addresses the calculation of profits in trademark โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621)
The Supreme Court case Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621) addresses whether plaintiffs who obtain a preliminary injunction, but whose case becomes moot before a final judgment, qualify as "prevailing parties" eligible for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. ยง1988(b). The Court โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case Lackey v. Stinnie (No. 23-621) addresses whether plaintiffs who obtain a preliminary injunction, but whose case โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Glossip v. Oklahoma (No. 22-7466)
The Supreme Court case *Glossip v. Oklahoma* (No. 22-7466), decided on February 25, 2025, addresses prosecutorial misconduct and the knowing use of false testimony in a capital murder trial. The Court reversed the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' (OCCA) decision, โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Glossip v. Oklahoma* (No. 22-7466), decided on February 25, 2025, addresses prosecutorial misconduct and the knowing โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Woodward v. California (No. 24-227)
The document is a statement by Justice Sotomayor regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of Woodward v. California. The case concerns the potential violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Woodward was tried twice for โ€ฆ The document is a statement by Justice Sotomayor regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of Woodward v. California. โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Rimlawi v. United States (No. 24-23)
The document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Gorsuch regarding the denial of certiorari in three cases (Rimlawi v. United States, Shah v. United States, and Jacob v. United States) from the Fifth Circuit. The central issue is whether a โ€ฆ The document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Gorsuch regarding the denial of certiorari in three cases (Rimlawi v. United โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Pina v. Dominguez (No. 24-152)
This document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, regarding the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in the case of Pina v. Dominguez. The case concerns the qualified immunity of a police officer (Pina) who used โ€ฆ This document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, regarding the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Coalition Life v. Carbondale (No. 24-57)
This document is a dissent from the denial of certiorari in the case of *Coalition Life v. Carbondale*. Justice Thomas argues that the Court should have taken the case to clarify the status of *Hill v. Colorado*, a case upholding โ€ฆ This document is a dissent from the denial of certiorari in the case of *Coalition Life v. Carbondale*. Justice Thomas โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Carter v. United States (No. 23-1281)
The document is a dissent from a denial of certiorari in the case of Carter v. United States. Justice Thomas argues that the Supreme Court should revisit the Feres doctrine, a judicially created exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act โ€ฆ The document is a dissent from a denial of certiorari in the case of Carter v. United States. Justice Thomas โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source