Presidential Actions
Bills of Congress
Supreme Court Opinions
Day
Week
Month
All

Showing 41โ€“50 of 120 documents

Document Date Top Benefits Top Disadvantages Constitutional Actions
Supreme Court Opinions
Martin v. United States (No. 24-362)
The Supreme Court case *Martin v. United States* (No. 24-362) addresses the scope of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) regarding government liability for torts committed by federal employees, specifically in the context of a wrong-house raid. The Court clarifies โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Martin v. United States* (No. 24-362) addresses the scope of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Commissioner v. Zuch (No. 24-416)
The Supreme Court case *Commissioner v. Zuch* (2025) addresses the jurisdiction of the U.S. Tax Court in collection due process (CDP) hearings when the IRS is no longer pursuing a levy. The court held that the Tax Court lacks jurisdiction โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Commissioner v. Zuch* (2025) addresses the jurisdiction of the U.S. Tax Court in collection due process โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School Dist. No. 279 (No. 24-249)
The Supreme Court case A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools addresses the standard of proof required for schoolchildren bringing claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act related to their education. The Court unanimously held โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools addresses the standard of proof required for schoolchildren bringing โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Parrish v. United States (No. 24-275)
The Supreme Court case Parrish v. United States addresses the procedural requirements for filing a notice of appeal after a district court has reopened the appeal period under 28 U.S.C. ยง2107(c). The Court held that a litigant who files a โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case Parrish v. United States addresses the procedural requirements for filing a notice of appeal after a โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Chambers-Smith v. Ayers (No. 24-584)
The document is a statement by Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, regarding the denial of certiorari in the case of *Chambers-Smith v. Ayers*. The case concerns Kayla Ayers, who was convicted of arson and child endangerment, and her subsequent โ€ฆ The document is a statement by Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, regarding the denial of certiorari in the case โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
SSA v. AFSCME (No. 24A1063)
This document is a Supreme Court decision regarding a stay application in the case of *Social Security Administration v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees*. The case concerns an executive order establishing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) โ€ฆ This document is a Supreme Court decision regarding a stay application in the case of *Social Security Administration v. American โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Davis (No. 24-304)
The Supreme Court case *Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Davis* (No. 24-304) involved a dispute over class certification in a lawsuit alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act. The plaintiffs, legally โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. Davis* (No. 24-304) involved a dispute over class certification in โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman (No. 23-1259)
The Supreme Court case *BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman* (No. 23-1259) addresses the standard for granting relief from a final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), particularly when a party seeks to amend a complaint. The Court held โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *BLOM Bank SAL v. Honickman* (No. 23-1259) addresses the standard for granting relief from a final โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos (No. 23-1141)
The Supreme Court case *Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos* (No. 23-1141) concerns the application of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). The Court unanimously held that Mexico's lawsuit against American gun manufacturers, alleging โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case *Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos* (No. 23-1141) concerns the application of the โ€ฆ
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source
Supreme Court Opinions
CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. (No. 23-1201)
The Supreme Court case CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. addresses the scope of personal jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court reversed the Ninth Circuit's decision, holding that the FSIA does not require a separate minimum โ€ฆ The Supreme Court case CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. addresses the scope of personal jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign โ€ฆ
โ€”
โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜… โ˜…
 View Source