Adams Memorial-Great American Heroes Act
Summary
The Adams Memorial-Great American Heroes Act reauthorizes the Adams Memorial Commission, extending its authority until 2032. It also addresses the location of the memorial, designating an area generally depicted on a map prepared by the Commission, while providing an alternative location within the Reserve if the primary site is unsuitable. The Act repeals sections 2 and 3 of Public Law 107-315, conforming to the new provisions.
This legislation aims to ensure the completion of the Adams Memorial by extending the Commission's lifespan and clarifying the site selection process. The bill passed the House of Representatives on December 9, 2025.
The Act amends previous legislation, including the John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act and Public Law 107-62 and 107-315, to reflect the reauthorization and location specifications.
Expected Effects
The likely effect of this act is the continued progress towards the establishment of the Adams Memorial. By extending the authorization of the Adams Memorial Commission and clarifying the location of the memorial, the Act removes potential roadblocks to the project's completion.
It also provides flexibility in site selection, allowing for adjustments based on physical or security constraints. The repeal of conflicting sections from previous legislation ensures consistency and clarity in the legal framework governing the memorial's development.
Potential Benefits
- Ensures the completion of a memorial honoring John Adams and his family.
- Provides clear guidelines for the location of the memorial.
- Offers flexibility in site selection to overcome potential obstacles.
- Extends the timeline for the project, allowing for thorough planning and execution.
- Preserves cultural heritage by commemorating significant figures in American history.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential for cost overruns associated with extending the Commission's authority.
- Possible delays in the project due to the extended timeline.
- Risk of disputes over the suitability of the memorial's location.
- Limited direct economic or social benefits to the broader population.
- The act does not address any immediate or pressing issues facing the nation.
Constitutional Alignment
The Act appears to align with the Constitution, as it falls under the legislative powers granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8, which includes the power to control federal lands and properties. The establishment of a national memorial can be seen as promoting the general welfare by preserving cultural heritage and honoring historical figures. The act does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
However, the use of federal funds for the memorial's construction could be subject to scrutiny regarding fiscal responsibility and efficient use of taxpayer money. The First Amendment regarding the Establishment Clause is not relevant here as the memorial does not promote any particular religion.
Furthermore, the Act's provisions regarding the location of the memorial on federal land are consistent with Congress's authority over such lands, as outlined in Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the Constitution.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).