Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

Affirming the partnership between the United States and Denmark and Greenland.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 70 affirms the partnership between the United States, Denmark, and Greenland. It emphasizes shared democratic values, collective security, and mutual respect for sovereignty. The resolution addresses concerns arising from potential US interest in acquiring Greenland, reaffirming that any changes must comply with treaty obligations and congressional authorization.

Expected Effects

This resolution reinforces existing diplomatic and security ties. It constrains the executive branch from unilateral action regarding Greenland. It also signals congressional commitment to cooperative international relations in the Arctic region.

Potential Benefits

  • Reaffirms US commitment to international treaties and alliances.
  • Reinforces the importance of diplomatic solutions and cooperation.
  • Prevents potential unilateral actions that could damage international relations.
  • Upholds the principle of congressional oversight in matters of war and foreign policy.
  • Promotes stability and security in the Arctic region through collaboration.

Potential Disadvantages

  • May limit the executive branch's flexibility in responding to unforeseen circumstances in the Arctic.
  • Could be perceived as a rebuke of the executive branch, potentially creating friction.
  • The resolution itself does not have the force of law, so its impact depends on future actions and interpretations.
  • It might be seen as a symbolic gesture without concrete policy changes.
  • There are no direct disadvantages to the American people.

Constitutional Alignment

The resolution aligns with the Constitution by asserting Congress's authority in matters of war, use of military force, and national defense spending, as outlined in Article I, Section 8. It also implicitly supports the treaty-making power of the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. The resolution reinforces the principle of civilian control over the military.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).