An Act To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994.
Summary
This Act reauthorizes the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994. It extends the program's authorization through 2031 and clarifies the definition of "State" by removing references to territories and possessions other than Guam and the Virgin Islands. The Act also specifies that funding for the program must come from existing appropriations to the Secretary for the Federal Duck Stamp Office.
Expected Effects
The reauthorization ensures the continuation of the Junior Duck Stamp program, which promotes conservation education through art. By limiting the funding source to existing appropriations, the Act aims to avoid increasing the overall budget. The change in the definition of "State" may affect the program's reach in certain territories.
Potential Benefits
- Continued support for conservation education through the arts for young people.
- Reinforces awareness of wetland habitats and waterfowl.
- Provides a creative outlet for students to engage with nature.
- May encourage future generations to participate in conservation efforts.
- No new funds are authorized, so it will not increase the budget.
Potential Disadvantages
- Limiting funding to existing appropriations could constrain the program's growth or necessitate resource reallocation from other areas.
- The exclusion of certain territories from the definition of "State" may reduce program accessibility in those areas.
- The impact on overall conservation efforts may be limited by the program's scope.
- The program may not reach all students equally, depending on school resources and participation rates.
Constitutional Alignment
This Act appears to align with the general welfare clause of the Constitution, as it promotes education and conservation. Article I, Section 8 grants Congress the power to make laws necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers. The Act does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).