Commending State and local governments for championing reproductive rights as human rights.
Summary
H. Con. Res. 65 is a concurrent resolution commending state and local governments for championing reproductive rights as human rights. The resolution addresses the overturning of Roe v. Wade and subsequent restrictions on abortion access in many states. It emphasizes the importance of reproductive rights as human rights, citing international human rights law and treaties ratified by the United States.
Expected Effects
If passed, this resolution would primarily serve as a symbolic gesture of support for state and local governments that are working to protect and expand access to reproductive healthcare. It could encourage further action at the state and local levels to safeguard reproductive rights. The resolution also puts pressure on states with restrictive abortion laws to reconsider their policies.
Potential Benefits
- Reinforces the importance of reproductive rights as human rights.
- Encourages state and local governments to protect and expand access to reproductive healthcare.
- Potentially reduces the criminalization of abortion and related services.
- Aligns domestic policy with international human rights standards.
- Supports access to essential healthcare services for all people.
Potential Disadvantages
- The resolution is non-binding and may not have a direct impact on state laws.
- Could face strong opposition from those who oppose abortion rights.
- May lead to further political polarization on the issue of reproductive healthcare.
- Potential for legal challenges based on differing interpretations of constitutional and human rights.
- May strain federal-state relations if states resist the resolution's recommendations.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution references Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which states that treaties ratified by the United States are the "supreme Law of the Land." It argues that restricting abortion rights is inconsistent with U.S. obligations under international human rights law. The resolution also implicitly touches on individual liberties and rights, though the Constitution does not explicitly mention abortion.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).