Condemning the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey and committing to advancing reproductive justice and judicial reform.
Summary
House Resolution 938 condemns the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. It commits to advancing reproductive justice and judicial reform. The resolution expresses concern over the potential erosion of fundamental rights and the impact on women's health and equality.
Expected Effects
If passed, the resolution would signal Congressional disapproval of the Dobbs decision. It would also commit the House to pursuing legislative actions related to judicial reform and reproductive rights. However, as a resolution, it does not have the force of law.
Potential Benefits
- Reinforces the importance of reproductive rights as a component of healthcare.
- Could lead to legislative efforts to codify abortion rights into federal law.
- Aims to protect vulnerable populations disproportionately affected by abortion restrictions.
- Promotes judicial reform to restore public confidence in the Supreme Court.
- Encourages the executive branch to take action on reproductive justice.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could further polarize political discourse surrounding abortion.
- May face significant opposition in the Senate or from the executive branch, limiting its practical impact.
- Could be viewed as an overreach of Congressional authority by some.
- May not fully address the complex legal and ethical considerations surrounding abortion.
- Could lead to increased litigation and legal challenges.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution raises questions regarding the balance of power between the judicial and legislative branches. Congress has the power to regulate the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article III, but the extent to which this can be used to influence judicial decisions is debated. The resolution also touches on the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause and the right to privacy, which have been central to abortion rights jurisprudence.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).