Cutting Cumbersome Overhead for Small-farm Testing Savings Act of 2025; Cutting COSTS Act of 2025
Summary
H.R. 6369, also known as the Cutting COSTS Act of 2025, aims to support small farmers by establishing a program within the Department of Agriculture to reimburse them for the costs associated with Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) audits. These audits are often required for market access, particularly to retail food stores. The bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to use funds from the Commodity Credit Corporation to implement this program and requires annual reports to Congress on its activities.
Expected Effects
The bill's enactment would lead to the creation of a new payment program for small farmers, potentially increasing their access to retail markets. This could lead to increased revenue for these farmers and a more stable food supply chain. The program is set to sunset after five years.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced financial burden for small farmers undergoing GAP audits.
- Increased market access for covered producers, potentially leading to higher revenues.
- Support for beginning farmers and ranchers.
- Improved compliance with food safety standards.
- Enhanced viability of small farms.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential strain on the Commodity Credit Corporation's funds.
- Administrative overhead for establishing and managing the payment program.
- Limited duration of the program (5-year sunset clause).
- Possible inequities if the program is not administered effectively.
- Potential for fraud or abuse in claiming audit costs.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill aligns with the General Welfare Clause (Article I, Section 8) of the Constitution, as it aims to support the agricultural sector and ensure a stable food supply. Congress has the power to regulate commerce, and this bill could be seen as a measure to facilitate interstate commerce by ensuring food safety standards are met. The bill does not appear to infringe on any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).