Denouncing dangerous and seditious rhetoric by Members of Congress and expressing condemnation of Senator Mark Kelly, Senator Elissa Slotkin, Representative Jason Crow, Representative Christopher Deluzio, Representative Maggie Goodlander, and Representative Chrissy Houlahan for attempting to sow disallegiance amongst members of the United States military and intelligence community and encouraging them to act against the Commander in Chief and President of the United States and violate the Unifo…
Summary
House Resolution 932 denounces specific Members of Congress for rhetoric that allegedly undermines the military and intelligence communities' trust in the Commander in Chief. It accuses them of encouraging insubordination and violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The resolution expresses concern over a video where these members purportedly urged defiance of 'illegal' orders, despite admitting a lack of evidence for such orders.
Expected Effects
If passed, this resolution would serve as a formal condemnation by the House of Representatives. It could lead to further disciplinary actions against the named members, although this is not explicitly stated. The resolution may also contribute to increased political polarization and distrust between different factions within the government and the public.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reinforces the importance of the chain of command within the military.
- May deter other members of Congress from making similar statements.
- Could strengthen public trust in the military's adherence to lawful orders.
- Upholds the principle of civilian control over the military.
- Reaffirms the President's role as Commander in Chief.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could be seen as an attempt to stifle free speech and dissent within Congress.
- May further polarize the political climate.
- Could create a chilling effect on legitimate oversight of the executive branch.
- The resolution relies on accusations without providing concrete evidence of sedition.
- Could be interpreted as an overreach of congressional power.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution raises concerns regarding the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech. While Congress has the power to declare war and maintain a military, denouncing members for expressing concerns, even if controversial, could be viewed as infringing upon their right to free speech. Article II, Section 2, establishes the President as Commander in Chief, and the resolution aims to protect this role. However, the Constitution also provides for checks and balances, including congressional oversight of the executive branch.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).