End H-1B Now Act
Summary
The "End H-1B Now Act" proposes to eliminate the H-1B visa program, phasing it out completely by fiscal year 2035. The bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to gradually reduce the number of H-1B visas issued each year. It also restricts eligible occupations to physicians, surgeons, and nurses, and removes fashion models from eligibility.
Additionally, the act limits Medicare funding for residency programs that train foreign nationals.
Expected Effects
The elimination of the H-1B program would significantly reduce the number of foreign workers in specialty occupations in the US. This could lead to changes in the labor market, particularly in sectors that heavily rely on H-1B visa holders. The limitation on Medicare funding could affect the availability of training programs for foreign medical professionals.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially increases job opportunities for US citizens and permanent residents in specialty occupations.
- May reduce competition for Medicare-funded residency positions for US medical graduates.
- Could lead to higher wages for US workers in certain fields due to reduced labor supply.
- May incentivize companies to invest more in training and developing domestic talent.
- Addresses concerns about potential exploitation of foreign workers under the H-1B program.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could lead to labor shortages in certain sectors, particularly in healthcare and technology.
- May hinder innovation and economic growth by limiting access to specialized skills and expertise.
- Could negatively impact US competitiveness in the global market.
- May disrupt existing business operations and projects that rely on H-1B visa holders.
- Could reduce the diversity of the US workforce.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's alignment with the US Constitution is complex. Congress has broad authority over immigration under Article I, Section 8, Clause 4, which grants the power to establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization.
However, the bill's potential impact on economic growth and innovation could be debated in relation to the Constitution's aim to "promote the general Welfare." The equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment could also be invoked if the bill is argued to discriminate unfairly against foreign nationals.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).