Extending the enforcement of certain budgetary points of order in the Senate.
Summary
Senate Resolution 458 aims to extend the enforcement of specific budgetary points of order within the Senate until September 30, 2027. This resolution modifies the application of certain sections of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. It specifically addresses subsections (c)(2) and (d)(3) of section 904, influencing budgetary procedures in the Senate.
The resolution, introduced by Mr. Graham and Mr. Merkley, was referred to the Committee on the Budget. Its primary goal is to maintain existing budgetary enforcement mechanisms.
The resolution does not alter the underlying budgetary act itself, but rather extends the period during which specific enforcement provisions remain active.
Expected Effects
The resolution's passage would mean that certain budgetary constraints and procedures remain in place for a longer duration than initially legislated. This could affect the Senate's ability to pass legislation that might otherwise be challenged on budgetary grounds.
It could lead to more stringent fiscal oversight within the Senate. The extension ensures continued adherence to existing budgetary rules.
Potential Benefits
- Maintains existing budgetary control mechanisms within the Senate.
- Could promote fiscal discipline by extending enforcement of budgetary points of order.
- Provides predictability in Senate budgetary procedures through September 30, 2027.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- May limit the Senate's flexibility in responding to unforeseen economic circumstances.
- Could hinder the passage of legislation deemed necessary by some senators due to budgetary constraints.
- Potentially reinforces existing power structures within the Senate related to budgetary control.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution appears to align with Article I, Section 5, which grants each house of Congress the power to determine the rules of its proceedings. By extending the enforcement of budgetary points of order, the Senate is exercising its constitutional authority to manage its internal processes.
However, the constitutionality hinges on whether the extended rules infringe upon other constitutional principles or rights. Absent such infringement, the resolution seems constitutionally sound.
It does not appear to violate any specific constitutional provision.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).