Gateways to Advancement and Preparedness for Military Service Act; GAP for Military Service Act
Summary
The Gateways to Advancement and Preparedness for Military Service Act (GAP for Military Service Act) directs the Comptroller General to conduct a feasibility study on a program to recruit individuals for one-year active duty service in the Armed Forces. The study will assess various aspects, including suitable military occupational specialties, training requirements, evaluation of similar programs in other countries, service details, implementation costs, and barriers. The report is due to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives within one year of the Act's enactment.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill, if enacted, would be the creation of a GAO report. This report would analyze the feasibility of a one-year active duty military service program. The results of the study could then inform future legislation or policy changes related to military recruitment and force structure.
Potential Benefits
- Provides data for potential new recruitment strategies.
- Could lead to a more diverse and skilled military force.
- May offer opportunities for individuals to explore military service without long-term commitment.
- The study includes analysis of similar programs in other countries, potentially leveraging best practices.
- Could improve military preparedness and national security.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- The study itself will incur costs.
- There is no guarantee the study will recommend implementing the program.
- The program may not be effective.
- The program could strain military resources and infrastructure.
- One-year service may disrupt individual career paths and educational pursuits.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to raise and support armies and provide for the common defense. The feasibility study itself does not infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations. The study is simply for informational purposes to help inform congress on future decisions.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).