H.R.2710 - People Over Parking Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.2710, the People Over Parking Act of 2025, aims to grant property owners the autonomy to decide the number of parking spots for new residential and commercial developments. This bill preempts state and local laws that mandate parking requirements within 0.5 miles of covered public transit points. The intention is to provide flexibility to developers and potentially encourage the use of public transportation.
Expected Effects
The bill, if enacted, would likely lead to a reduction in mandatory parking spaces in new developments near public transit. This could influence urban planning, potentially decreasing construction costs and promoting alternative transportation methods. It may also shift control from local governments to property owners regarding parking provisions.
Potential Benefits
- Reduced Construction Costs: Developers may save money by building fewer parking spaces.
- Increased Housing Density: Fewer parking requirements could allow for more housing units in a given area.
- Promotion of Public Transit: Reduced parking may incentivize residents to use public transportation.
- Greater Flexibility for Property Owners: Owners gain more control over their development projects.
- Potential for More Green Space: Less space dedicated to parking could be used for green areas or other amenities.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential Parking Shortages: Reduced parking could lead to difficulties finding parking spaces, especially in densely populated areas.
- Increased Traffic Congestion: If public transit is not sufficient, more people may drive around searching for parking.
- Negative Impact on Businesses: Some businesses may rely on ample parking to attract customers.
- Strain on Public Transit Systems: Increased ridership could strain existing public transit infrastructure.
- Local Control Concerns: Preemption of state and local laws could be seen as an overreach of federal power.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's preemption of state and local laws raises questions regarding the balance of power between the federal government and the states, potentially implicating the Tenth Amendment. The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) could be invoked to justify federal intervention if the parking regulations are deemed to affect interstate commerce. However, the extent of this effect and the appropriateness of federal preemption would be subject to debate.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).