H.R.3056 - Camp Nelson National Monument Boundary Expansion Act (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3056, the Camp Nelson National Monument Boundary Expansion Act, seeks to redesignate the Camp Nelson Heritage National Monument as Camp Nelson National Monument and authorize the acquisition of approximately 132 acres of land to expand the monument's boundaries. The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to acquire the land depicted on a specific map for inclusion in the monument. This involves amending Section 2303 of the John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act to reflect the name change.
Expected Effects
The likely effect of this bill is the expansion of the Camp Nelson National Monument and a simplification of its name. This could lead to increased tourism and preservation of historical land. It formally authorizes the Department of Interior to proceed with land acquisition.
Potential Benefits
- Preservation of Historical Land: Protects an additional 132 acres of land with historical significance related to Camp Nelson.
- Increased Tourism: Expanding the monument could attract more visitors, boosting the local economy.
- Simplification of Name: Streamlines the monument's name for clarity and ease of recognition.
- Enhanced Educational Opportunities: Provides more space and resources for educational programs and historical interpretation.
- Federal Recognition: Reinforces the federal government's commitment to preserving and commemorating this important site.
Potential Disadvantages
- Land Acquisition Costs: Acquiring the 132 acres will involve government expenditure, potentially diverting funds from other areas.
- Potential Landowner Disputes: The acquisition process could lead to disputes with current landowners regarding fair compensation or property rights.
- Maintenance Costs: Expanding the monument will increase long-term maintenance and operational costs for the National Park Service.
- Limited Impact: The impact on most Americans outside of the immediate region is likely to be minimal.
- Potential for Overreach: Concerns about the federal government expanding its land holdings.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the US Constitution, particularly Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to regulate and administer federal lands and properties. The establishment and expansion of national monuments fall under this purview. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any individual liberties or rights guaranteed by the Constitution or its amendments.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).