H.R.3112 - Better Collaboration, Accountability, and Regulatory Enforcement for Animals Act of 2025; Better CARE for Animals Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
H.R.3112, the Better CARE for Animals Act of 2025, aims to strengthen the enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). It expands the authority of the Attorney General to bring civil actions against those who violate the AWA and its regulations. The bill also includes provisions for seizing and forfeiting animals subjected to mistreatment and using penalties to cover the costs of temporary care for seized animals.
Expected Effects
The bill is likely to result in stricter enforcement of animal welfare standards. This could lead to increased investigations, penalties, and legal actions against individuals and businesses found in violation of the AWA. The memorandum of understanding between the Secretary of Agriculture and the Attorney General should streamline enforcement efforts.
Potential Benefits
- Stronger Animal Protection: Enhanced enforcement capabilities will likely lead to better protection for animals covered under the AWA.
- Increased Accountability: Those who violate animal welfare laws will face greater scrutiny and potential legal consequences.
- Resource Allocation: Fines collected will be used to support the care of seized animals, easing the burden on animal shelters and rescue organizations.
- Deterrence: Stiffer penalties and the prospect of legal action by the Attorney General may deter future violations.
- Improved Collaboration: The required memorandum of understanding should foster better coordination between the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Justice.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Increased Burden on Legal System: More frequent lawsuits and investigations could strain the resources of the justice system.
- Potential for Overreach: Broadened enforcement powers could lead to overly aggressive actions against businesses or individuals.
- Cost to Taxpayers: Increased enforcement activities will require additional funding, potentially increasing costs for taxpayers.
- Unintended Consequences: Strict regulations could unintentionally harm legitimate businesses or organizations that work with animals.
- Potential for Inconsistent Enforcement: Disparities in enforcement could arise depending on the priorities and resources of different jurisdictions.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) as it regulates activities involving animals in interstate commerce. The expansion of enforcement powers does not seem to infringe upon individual liberties protected by the Bill of Rights, provided due process is followed in investigations and legal proceedings. The Fourth Amendment regarding unreasonable search and seizure would still apply, requiring warrants based on probable cause.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).