Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

H.R.es189 - Censuring Representative Al Green of Texas. (119th Congress)

Summary

H.Res.189 proposes to censure Representative Al Green for disrupting the President's address to a joint session of Congress. The resolution cites Mr. Green's interruption of the proceedings and subsequent removal from the chamber as the basis for the censure. The censure would involve a formal reprimand, a requirement for Mr. Green to present himself in the House well, and a public reading of the resolution by the Speaker.

Expected Effects

If passed, Representative Green would be formally censured by the House of Representatives. This action carries a symbolic weight, representing the House's disapproval of his conduct. It could also potentially impact his standing within the House and his future committee assignments.

Potential Benefits

  • Upholding decorum and order in congressional proceedings.
  • Reinforcing the importance of respectful dialogue during official addresses.
  • Maintaining the integrity of the House of Representatives.
  • Setting a precedent for addressing disruptive behavior in Congress.
  • Potentially deterring similar disruptions in the future.

Potential Disadvantages

  • Potential for escalating political tensions and further dividing the House.
  • Accusations of stifling dissent or freedom of speech, even if disruptive.
  • Distraction from other legislative priorities.
  • Possible perception of disproportionate punishment.
  • Risk of setting a precedent that could be used to silence minority voices.

Constitutional Alignment

While the Constitution grants each house of Congress the power to determine the rules of its proceedings (Article I, Section 5), the First Amendment protects freedom of speech. The key question is whether the Representative's actions, while disruptive, fall under protected speech or constitute a violation of established rules of decorum. The House has broad authority to maintain order, but must be careful not to infringe on constitutional rights.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).