H.R.es273 - Expressing support for the diplomatic relations required to encourage the Government of Mexico to fulfill its water deliveries on an annual basis to the United States under the treaty between the United States and Mexico regarding the utilization of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res.273 expresses the House of Representatives' support for diplomatic efforts to encourage Mexico to fulfill its annual water deliveries to the United States, as stipulated in the 1944 treaty regarding the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and the Rio Grande. The resolution addresses concerns about water shortages experienced by farmers in South Texas due to Mexico's delayed water deliveries. It urges Mexico to meet its commitments on an annual basis, ensuring the United States receives at least 350,000 acre-feet of water annually.
Expected Effects
If passed, this resolution would likely increase pressure on the US government to prioritize diplomatic engagement with Mexico regarding water deliveries. It could also lead to increased scrutiny of Mexico's water management practices and potentially influence future negotiations or agreements related to water resources. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure a more reliable water supply for farmers in South Texas.
Potential Benefits
- Securing Water Resources: Ensures the US receives its treaty-mandated water allocation.
- Supporting Agriculture: Helps alleviate water shortages for farmers in South Texas.
- Strengthening Diplomatic Relations: Promotes constructive dialogue with Mexico on water management.
- Promoting Treaty Compliance: Encourages adherence to international agreements.
- Enhancing Regional Stability: Contributes to stability in the US-Mexico border region.
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential Strain on Relations: Could create tension with Mexico if perceived as overly assertive.
- Limited Enforceability: A resolution lacks the force of law and relies on diplomatic persuasion.
- Focus on One Region: May not address broader water resource challenges across the US.
- Risk of Unintended Consequences: Pressure on Mexico could lead to unforeseen retaliatory measures.
- Complexity of Water Management: Oversimplifies the complex factors influencing water availability.
Constitutional Alignment
While the Constitution does not explicitly address water treaties, the power to make treaties is granted to the President with the advice and consent of the Senate under Article II, Section 2. This resolution supports the enforcement of an existing treaty, aligning with the federal government's authority to conduct foreign affairs. Additionally, the resolution indirectly relates to the general welfare clause, as ensuring water resources can positively impact the well-being of communities and agricultural sectors.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).