H.R.es354 - Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 60) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 78) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife…
Summary
H.Res. 354 is a resolution providing for the consideration of several joint resolutions in the House of Representatives. These joint resolutions (H.J. Res. 60, 78, 87, 88, and 89) aim to disapprove rules submitted by various federal agencies, including the National Park Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The resolution outlines the procedures for debating and voting on these joint resolutions, waiving points of order and limiting debate time.
Expected Effects
The resolution, if adopted, will expedite the process of considering and potentially passing joint resolutions that would overturn agency rules. This could lead to the reversal of regulations concerning motor vehicle usage in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, endangered species protection for the Longfin Smelt, and California's vehicle emission standards.
Potential Benefits
- Streamlined legislative process for addressing agency regulations.
- Potential for quicker response to perceived overreach by federal agencies.
- Allows Congress to exert its oversight authority more efficiently.
- Could lead to regulatory changes that proponents argue are beneficial for specific sectors or states.
- Provides a mechanism for Congress to check the power of the executive branch.
Potential Disadvantages
- May lead to the overturning of regulations that protect the environment or public health.
- Could create uncertainty for businesses and individuals who rely on existing regulations.
- Limits debate and amendment opportunities, potentially hindering thorough consideration of the issues.
- Could be perceived as undermining the authority of expert agencies.
- May exacerbate political polarization by prioritizing speed over consensus-building.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
This resolution aligns with Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which vests all legislative powers in Congress. It also relates to Congress's oversight function, allowing it to review and potentially disapprove of rules issued by executive branch agencies. The use of joint resolutions for congressional disapproval is authorized under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, often referred to as the Congressional Review Act (CRA).
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).