H.R.es406 - Removing certain Members from certain standing committees of the House of Representatives. (119th Congress)
Summary
H.Res. 406 proposes the removal of specific members from certain standing committees of the House of Representatives. The resolution identifies Mrs. Watson Coleman for removal from the Committee on Appropriations, Mr. Menendez from the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and Mrs. McIver from both the Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on Small Business. The resolution was submitted by Mr. Carter of Georgia and referred to the Committee on Ethics.
Expected Effects
If passed, the resolution would alter the composition of the named House committees. This could potentially shift the balance of power or influence within those committees. The removal of members could impact the committees' ability to address specific issues or advance certain legislative agendas.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially improves committee efficiency by removing members deemed ineffective or disruptive.
- Allows for the appointment of new members who may bring fresh perspectives and expertise.
- Could address ethical concerns or conflicts of interest if the removals are based on such grounds.
- May enhance public trust in the integrity and functioning of the House committees.
- Could lead to more productive and collaborative committee work.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could be perceived as politically motivated, leading to increased partisanship and gridlock.
- May disrupt the continuity and institutional knowledge within the committees.
- Could disenfranchise the constituents represented by the removed members.
- May set a precedent for the removal of members based on political disagreements rather than ethical violations.
- Could create instability and uncertainty within the committee system.
Constitutional Alignment
The Constitution grants each chamber of Congress the power to determine its own rules and proceedings. Article I, Section 5, clause 2 states that "Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member." While this resolution does not involve expulsion, the power to determine committee assignments and removals falls under the House's authority to manage its internal affairs. The resolution's alignment with the Constitution depends on whether the removals are conducted fairly and in accordance with established House rules and precedents.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).