No Aid for Illegal Entry Act
Summary
The "No Aid for Illegal Entry Act" aims to prohibit federal funds from being used by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the Department of the Interior for providing certain immigration-related services to individuals who are in the United States without lawful status. The bill makes an exception for services provided to minors. The Act seeks to limit the use of federal resources in supporting undocumented immigrants, focusing on legal services, housing, and transportation.
Expected Effects
If enacted, this bill would restrict the ability of NGOs to use federal funds for providing services to undocumented immigrants, potentially reducing the support available to this population. The Department of Interior would also be restricted from activities related to migrant resettlement and immigration enforcement. The impact would primarily be felt by NGOs that rely on federal funding for immigration-related services.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially reduces the financial burden on taxpayers by limiting federal spending on services for undocumented immigrants.
- May deter illegal immigration by reducing available support services.
- Could redirect federal funds to other areas deemed higher priority by Congress.
- May incentivize NGOs to focus resources on services for minors, as they are exempt from the prohibition.
- Could strengthen border security by limiting resources available for migrant resettlement.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could negatively impact the well-being of undocumented immigrants by reducing access to legal services, housing, and transportation.
- May strain the resources of local communities and states if the federal government reduces support.
- Could lead to increased homelessness and destitution among undocumented immigrants.
- May face legal challenges based on humanitarian concerns and equal protection arguments.
- Could damage the reputation of the United States as a country that values human rights and provides assistance to vulnerable populations.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill's constitutionality could be challenged under the Fifth Amendment's due process clause, which guarantees certain rights to all persons within the United States, regardless of immigration status. Additionally, the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of association could be invoked if the restrictions unduly burden NGOs' ability to provide services. The bill's alignment with the Constitution depends on whether the restrictions are deemed reasonable and narrowly tailored to serve a legitimate government interest. Article I, Section 8, grants Congress the power to establish uniform Rule of Naturalization.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).