Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act
Summary
The "Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act" aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit the entry of aliens who adhere to Sharia law. It mandates the denial of immigration benefits, visas, or admission to the United States for individuals adhering to Sharia law. Furthermore, it allows for the removal of aliens already in the US found to be adherents of Sharia law.
Expected Effects
This bill, if enacted, would significantly alter immigration procedures and criteria. It would grant broad authority to the Secretary of State, Secretary of Homeland Security, and Attorney General to determine adherence to Sharia law, with such determinations being non-reviewable by any court. This could lead to increased scrutiny and potential denial of entry or deportation for individuals based on their religious beliefs or perceived adherence to a specific legal system.
Potential Benefits
- Could be perceived as enhancing national security by preventing the entry of individuals deemed to pose a threat due to their adherence to Sharia law.
- May appeal to those who believe Sharia law is incompatible with American values and legal principles.
- Could be seen as protecting American culture and way of life from perceived external influences.
- Supporters might argue it reinforces the rule of law by preventing the application of foreign legal systems within the United States.
Potential Disadvantages
- Raises concerns about religious freedom and potential discrimination against Muslims.
- The definition of "adherence to Sharia law" is vague and could be subject to broad interpretation, leading to arbitrary enforcement.
- The non-reviewability clause could deny due process and equal protection under the law.
- Could damage the United States' international standing and reputation as a country that values religious freedom and tolerance.
- May lead to increased alienation and distrust among Muslim communities in the United States.
Constitutional Alignment
This bill raises significant constitutional concerns, particularly regarding the First Amendment's guarantee of religious freedom. By specifically targeting individuals based on their adherence to Sharia law, the bill could be seen as violating the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. Additionally, the non-reviewability clause may conflict with the principle of due process and equal protection under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).