Protecting America’s Resources from Kings Act; PARK Act
Summary
The "Protecting America's Resources from Kings Act" (PARK Act) aims to prohibit National Park System entrance fee waivers commemorating the birthday of a sitting President, unless that birthday coincides with a Federal holiday. This bill seeks to modify the existing fee structure within the National Park and National Wildlife Refuge Systems. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives on January 15, 2026.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of the PARK Act would be to eliminate the discretionary practice of waiving entrance fees for National Parks on a sitting President's birthday, except when it aligns with an existing Federal holiday. This could lead to increased revenue for the National Park System. It also standardizes fee waiver policies.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially increased revenue for the National Park System through consistent fee collection.
- Standardized entrance fee policies, promoting fairness and transparency.
- Reduced potential for political influence or perceived favoritism in park access.
- Reinforces the principle that national resources are a shared responsibility, supported by user fees.
- May lead to better resource allocation within the National Park System.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Potential public perception of reduced accessibility to National Parks.
- Could be seen as a symbolic gesture of limiting presidential recognition.
- Possible negative impact on tourism if fee waivers previously incentivized visits.
- May disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who relied on fee waivers.
- Limited impact on overall park funding or conservation efforts.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The PARK Act appears to align with the Constitution, as it falls under the legislative powers granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8, which includes the power to manage federal lands and properties. The act does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or freedoms. The bill does not appear to violate any specific provisions within the Constitution.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).