Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision.
Summary
This joint resolution aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) concerning the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision. The resolution utilizes the Congressional Review Act, specifically chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to challenge the BLM's decision. The disapproval, if enacted, would nullify the rule, preventing it from having legal force or effect.
Expected Effects
If the resolution passes, the BLM's rule regarding oil and gas leasing in the Coastal Plain will be invalidated. This would likely halt or significantly alter the planned oil and gas leasing program. The future of energy development in the Coastal Plain would then be subject to further legislative or administrative action.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially protects the Coastal Plain's environment.
- May prevent negative impacts on local communities and ecosystems.
- Could lead to a reassessment of energy policy in the region, prioritizing sustainability.
- Aligns with environmental protection goals for some stakeholders.
- Upholds congressional oversight of agency actions.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could reduce potential energy production from the Coastal Plain.
- May negatively impact job creation in the oil and gas industry.
- Could increase reliance on foreign energy sources.
- May lead to legal challenges and uncertainty for businesses.
- Potentially hinders economic development in the region.
Constitutional Alignment
This resolution aligns with the principle of congressional oversight of executive agencies, as established in Article I, Section 1, which vests all legislative powers in Congress. The Congressional Review Act itself is an exercise of these powers, allowing Congress to review and potentially disapprove agency rules. The resolution does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).