Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.
Summary
This joint resolution disapproves of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) Public Land Order No. 7917, which concerns the withdrawal of federal lands in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, Minnesota. The resolution utilizes the Congressional Review Act, allowing Congress to overturn agency rules. If enacted, the BLM's rule would have no force or effect.
Expected Effects
The disapproval would prevent the withdrawal of federal lands in the specified Minnesota counties. This means the land would remain open to uses that would have been restricted under the BLM's order. The specific impacts depend on the intended uses and restrictions of the original Public Land Order.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially allows for continued resource extraction (mining, logging) on the land.
- May preserve recreational access for activities like hunting, fishing, and hiking.
- Could prevent economic disruption if the withdrawal negatively impacted local industries.
- May align with local community preferences regarding land use.
- Could reduce perceived federal overreach in land management.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could lead to environmental degradation if resource extraction is not properly managed.
- May hinder conservation efforts and protection of sensitive ecosystems.
- Could conflict with tribal rights or interests if the land has cultural or historical significance.
- May limit opportunities for scientific research or educational activities.
- Could negatively impact long-term sustainability of natural resources.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
This resolution aligns with Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution, which vests all legislative powers in Congress. The Congressional Review Act, under which this resolution is made, is a mechanism for Congress to check the power of the executive branch and ensure agency rules align with congressional intent. The resolution itself does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or protections.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).