Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4626) to amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the Secretary of Energy from prescribing any new or amended energy conservation standard for a product that is not technologically feasible and economically justified, and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4758) to repeal provisions of Public Law 117–169 relating to taxpayer subsidies for home electrification, and for other purposes.
Summary
H.Res. 1075 provides for the consideration of two bills: H.R. 4626 and H.R. 4758. H.R. 4626 amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, aiming to prevent the Secretary of Energy from setting energy conservation standards that aren't technologically feasible or economically justified. H.R. 4758 seeks to repeal taxpayer subsidies for home electrification outlined in Public Law 117-169.
Expected Effects
If adopted, H.R. 4626 would likely lead to fewer new energy conservation standards, potentially reducing regulatory burdens on manufacturers. H.R. 4758's passage would eliminate taxpayer-funded subsidies for home electrification, shifting the financial burden to homeowners or the market.
Potential Benefits
- Could reduce compliance costs for manufacturers regarding energy conservation standards.
- May lead to lower prices for certain appliances if manufacturers are not forced to adopt costly new technologies.
- Could reduce government spending by eliminating subsidies for home electrification.
- May encourage more market-driven innovation in home electrification technologies.
- Could prevent the implementation of energy standards that are not practical or cost-effective.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- May slow down the adoption of more energy-efficient appliances and technologies.
- Could hinder efforts to combat climate change by reducing incentives for energy conservation.
- May increase energy costs for consumers in the long run if less efficient appliances are used.
- Could disproportionately affect low-income households who rely on subsidies for home electrification.
- May reduce the competitiveness of US companies in the global market for energy-efficient technologies.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution itself is procedurally aligned with Article I, Section 5, which grants each House the power to determine the rules of its proceedings. The underlying bills relate to energy policy and taxation, areas where Congress has broad authority under Article I, Section 8 (the Commerce Clause and the power to lay and collect taxes). The constitutionality of the specific provisions within H.R. 4626 and H.R. 4758 would depend on their specific details and potential conflicts with other constitutional principles.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).