S.1657 - Review Every Veteran’s Claim Act of 2025 (119th Congress)
Summary
S.1657, the Review Every Veteran's Claim Act of 2025, aims to amend Title 38 of the United States Code. The bill seeks to limit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs' authority to deny a veteran's claim for benefits solely because the veteran failed to attend a scheduled medical examination. The bill was introduced in the Senate by Mr. Banks and Mr. King and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill, if enacted, would be to prevent the VA from automatically denying benefits to veterans who miss medical examinations. The VA would need to consider other evidence and factors before making a determination on the claim. This could lead to more veterans receiving benefits and potentially increase the workload for the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Potential Benefits
- Prevents automatic denial of benefits based solely on missed medical appointments.
- Ensures a more comprehensive review of veterans' claims.
- Potentially increases the number of veterans receiving deserved benefits.
- Could reduce appeals based on procedural issues.
- May lead to a fairer and more equitable claims process.
Potential Disadvantages
- May increase the workload for the Department of Veterans Affairs, potentially leading to delays in processing claims.
- Could increase the number of approved claims, leading to higher costs for the VA.
- May incentivize some veterans to skip medical examinations, potentially hindering the claims process.
- Could create opportunities for fraudulent claims if not properly monitored.
- Potential for increased administrative burden to track and manage claims where medical exams were missed.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution's general welfare clause (Preamble) by aiming to support veterans. Congress has the power to legislate regarding veteran affairs under Article I, Section 8, which grants the power to provide for the common defense and general welfare. The bill does not appear to infringe upon any specific constitutional rights or limitations.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).