Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

S.1814 - Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act of 2025 (119th Congress)

Summary

The Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act of 2025 (S.1814) aims to enhance the ethical standards and transparency of the Supreme Court. It mandates the creation of a code of conduct for Supreme Court justices, similar to that of other federal judges. The bill also establishes procedures for handling complaints against justices and sets minimum standards for gift disclosure and recusal.

Expected Effects

The bill's enactment would lead to increased accountability and public trust in the Supreme Court. It would provide mechanisms for addressing ethical concerns and ensuring impartiality in judicial proceedings. The new disclosure requirements for parties and amici curiae will shed light on potential conflicts of interest.

Potential Benefits

  • Increased transparency in the Supreme Court's operations.
  • Enhanced accountability for justices through a formal complaint process.
  • Clearer guidelines for recusal, reducing potential bias in decisions.
  • Public access to ethics rules and related information.
  • Greater public confidence in the integrity of the judicial system.

Potential Disadvantages

  • Potential for politically motivated complaints against justices.
  • Possible delays in court proceedings due to disqualification motions.
  • Increased administrative burden on the Supreme Court and related entities.
  • Risk of unintended consequences from overly strict recusal requirements.
  • Difficulty in enforcing ethical standards on the Supreme Court due to its unique position.

Constitutional Alignment

The bill's focus on ethics and transparency aligns with the Constitution's aim to 'establish Justice' and ensure a fair legal system. While the Constitution does not explicitly address the ethics of Supreme Court justices, Congress has the power to regulate the judiciary through legislation, as outlined in Article I, Section 8. The bill does not appear to infringe upon the separation of powers or any specific constitutional right.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).