Shutdown Fairness Act
Summary
The Shutdown Fairness Act aims to provide appropriations for the pay and allowances of 'excepted' Federal employees and contractors during periods when interim or full-year appropriations are not in effect. It defines 'excepted employees' as those deemed essential by their agency heads, including those performing emergency work, as defined by the Office of Personnel Management, and contractors supporting these employees. The bill ensures that these employees and contractors continue to receive pay during government shutdowns.
Expected Effects
This act would ensure that essential government employees and contractors continue to be paid during government shutdowns. This could reduce the disruption caused by shutdowns and maintain essential government services. The appropriations would be charged to the agency's regular appropriation once it becomes law.
Potential Benefits
- Ensures continued pay for essential federal employees during government shutdowns.
- Maintains critical government services during funding lapses.
- Reduces the financial burden on excepted employees and contractors.
- Potentially improves employee morale and productivity during shutdowns.
- Provides stability for contractors supporting essential government functions.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could potentially reduce the incentive for Congress to avoid government shutdowns, as the immediate impact is lessened.
- May increase government spending if shutdowns become more frequent or prolonged.
- The definition of 'excepted employee' could be subject to interpretation and potential abuse.
- Requires careful monitoring to ensure funds are used appropriately and efficiently.
- Potential for disputes over which contractors are deemed 'required to perform work'.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the Constitution, specifically Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to appropriate funds. The bill's purpose of ensuring the functioning of essential government services during funding gaps could be argued to support the general welfare, as outlined in the Preamble. However, the potential for increased spending and reduced incentive to avoid shutdowns could raise concerns about fiscal responsibility, which indirectly relates to the Constitution's emphasis on a stable government.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).