Stand with Israel Act of 2026
Summary
The "Stand with Israel Act of 2026" aims to limit US funding to the United Nations if Israel is illegally expelled. It amends Section 115(b) of the Department of State Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1984 and 1985, to withhold funds from any UN organ or agency involved in such expulsion. The bill reflects congressional concern over potential anti-Israel actions within the UN.
The bill seeks to exert financial pressure on the UN to prevent what the US might consider an "illegal expulsion" of Israel. This action would be considered a strong stance in support of Israel's position within the international community.
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Expected Effects
If enacted, the bill would result in the United States withholding funds from the United Nations should Israel be expelled. This could strain the relationship between the US and the UN.
The UN's operations could be affected due to the reduction in funding from the US. The bill could also lead to debates regarding the definition of "illegal expulsion" and the criteria for reinstating US funding.
Other nations may re-evaluate their relationship with the UN based on the actions taken by the US.
Potential Benefits
- Strengthens US commitment to Israel.
- Potentially deters anti-Israel actions within the UN.
- Reinforces US foreign policy priorities.
- Could lead to reforms within the UN to prevent bias.
- Sends a clear message about US values and alliances.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Strains US relations with the UN and other member states.
- Reduces US influence within the UN system.
- May hinder the UN's ability to address global challenges.
- Could be seen as undermining international cooperation.
- May set a precedent for withholding funds based on political disagreements.
Most Disadvantaged Areas:
Constitutional Alignment
The bill falls under Congress's power to regulate foreign commerce and conduct foreign policy, as outlined in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. Specifically, it relates to the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. However, the bill's potential impact on international relations and treaty obligations could raise questions about the balance of powers between the legislative and executive branches.
Amendment I, regarding freedom of speech, is not directly implicated, but the bill could be viewed as an expression of US policy preferences on the international stage. The bill does not appear to violate any specific constitutional provision, but its implementation would need to be carefully managed to avoid conflicts with existing treaty obligations and international law.
Ultimately, the constitutionality hinges on whether the conditions placed on funding are deemed reasonable and within the scope of Congress's enumerated powers.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).