Bills of Congress by U.S. Congress

Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development Act; SPEED Act

Summary

The Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development Act (SPEED Act) aims to amend the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. The goal is to streamline the environmental review process for federal projects. This is achieved by clarifying ambiguous provisions and promoting efficiency and timeliness.

Expected Effects

The SPEED Act would likely result in faster environmental reviews for infrastructure and development projects. It could also limit the scope of environmental impact assessments. This could lead to quicker project approvals but potentially less comprehensive environmental oversight.

Potential Benefits

  • Faster project approvals for infrastructure and economic development.
  • Reduced regulatory burden on businesses and government agencies.
  • Clarified NEPA procedures, leading to more predictable outcomes.
  • Potential for increased economic activity due to expedited project timelines.
  • Limits on judicial review, potentially reducing frivolous lawsuits and delays.

Potential Disadvantages

  • Potentially less thorough environmental reviews, leading to overlooked environmental impacts.
  • Reduced public input and transparency in the environmental review process.
  • Increased risk of environmental damage due to expedited project approvals.
  • Limits on the scope of effects considered, potentially ignoring long-term or indirect consequences.
  • Restrictions on judicial review may limit accountability for environmental violations.

Constitutional Alignment

The SPEED Act's alignment with the Constitution is primarily related to Congress's power to regulate commerce (Article I, Section 8). By streamlining environmental reviews, the Act aims to facilitate economic development, which falls under the purview of interstate commerce regulation. However, the Act's potential impact on environmental protection could raise concerns about the government's responsibility to promote the general welfare.

Impact Assessment: Things You Care About

This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).