To designate the portion of Interstate Route 680 in Omaha, Nebraska, as the Hal Daub Freeway.
Summary
This bill designates a portion of Interstate Route 680 in Omaha, Nebraska, as the "Hal Daub Freeway." The designation applies to the section of I-680 beginning at mile post 0 and ending at the Missouri River. Any reference to this section of I-680 in official documents will be deemed a reference to the "Hal Daub Freeway."
The bill was introduced in the Senate by Mrs. Fischer and Mr. Ricketts. It was then referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works for consideration.
This action is a symbolic gesture that does not directly impact funding, regulations, or infrastructure development.
Expected Effects
The primary effect of this bill is to rename a portion of Interstate Route 680 in Omaha, Nebraska. This change will be reflected in official maps, regulations, and documents. The renaming serves as a tribute to Hal Daub.
Potential Benefits
- Honors Hal Daub's contributions to the community.
- May increase local awareness of Hal Daub's legacy.
- Could foster a sense of community pride.
- Provides a landmark with a specific name for easier reference.
- No direct financial cost or burden on taxpayers.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- May require updating signage and official documents, incurring minor costs.
- Could be perceived as a low-priority issue compared to more pressing concerns.
- May not be universally supported if some individuals disagree with honoring Hal Daub.
- Could set a precedent for similar renaming requests, potentially leading to confusion if not managed carefully.
- Does not address any substantive issues related to infrastructure or transportation.
Constitutional Alignment
The bill appears to align with the US Constitution, as it falls under the legislative powers granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8, which allows them to regulate interstate commerce and establish post offices and post roads. The designation of a highway name does not infringe upon any individual rights or liberties protected by the Constitution or its amendments.
Furthermore, the bill does not violate any specific prohibitions outlined in the Constitution. It does not establish a religion, abridge freedom of speech, or infringe upon the right to bear arms. Therefore, it can be considered constitutionally sound.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).