Urging the Director of the Food and Drug Administration to reevaluate the safety of all chemical abortion drugs in light of recent independent studies, and for other purposes.
Summary
House Resolution 803 urges the Director of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reevaluate the safety of all chemical abortion drugs, citing concerns over expanded access and potential risks. The resolution references independent studies suggesting higher complication rates than reported by the FDA and drug manufacturers. It also highlights concerns about taxpayer funding for providers prescribing these drugs.
Expected Effects
If adopted, this resolution could lead to increased scrutiny of chemical abortion drugs by the FDA. This could potentially result in stricter regulations or the withdrawal of certain drugs from the market. The resolution also aims to raise public awareness about the perceived risks associated with chemical abortions.
Potential Benefits
- Potentially increased patient safety through reevaluation of drug safety data.
- Greater transparency through public release of a full safety review.
- Addresses concerns about potential violations of federal law related to drug access.
- Could lead to improved oversight and regulation of chemical abortion drugs.
- May reduce potential risks of coercion and domestic abuse related to abortion.
Potential Disadvantages
- Could restrict access to abortion services, particularly in rural areas.
- May disproportionately affect low-income individuals who rely on publicly funded healthcare.
- Could create barriers to healthcare access based on political or ideological beliefs.
- May increase the cost and difficulty of obtaining abortion services.
- Could lead to increased unintended pregnancies if access to abortion is restricted.
Constitutional Alignment
The resolution touches upon issues related to healthcare access and reproductive rights, which have been subjects of constitutional debate. While the Constitution does not explicitly mention abortion, the Supreme Court has recognized a right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment, which has been interpreted to include abortion access. This resolution could be seen as an attempt to regulate or restrict that access, potentially leading to legal challenges based on constitutional grounds.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).