Withdrawing the United States from International Organizations, Conventions, and Treaties that Are Contrary to the Interests of the United States
Summary
This Presidential Memorandum directs the heads of executive departments and agencies to withdraw the United States from various international organizations, conventions, and treaties deemed contrary to U.S. interests. This action follows Executive Order 14199, which mandated a review of international organizations and agreements to which the U.S. provides support.
The memorandum lists specific organizations, both within and outside the United Nations system, from which the U.S. will withdraw. The directive emphasizes ceasing participation in and funding to these entities to the extent permitted by law.
The Secretary of State is tasked with providing additional guidance for implementing the memorandum. The action is framed as consistent with the President's constitutional authority and aimed at protecting U.S. interests.
Expected Effects
The immediate effect will be the cessation of U.S. participation and funding to the organizations listed in the memorandum. This could lead to a shift in U.S. foreign policy and a potential reduction in international cooperation on various global issues.
Other nations may need to fill the void left by the U.S. in these organizations. It could also strain diplomatic relations with countries that strongly support these international bodies.
Potential Benefits
- Could free up financial resources previously allocated to these organizations, potentially allowing for reallocation to domestic priorities.
- May reduce perceived constraints on U.S. sovereignty and decision-making.
- Could strengthen the U.S.'s ability to pursue its interests without being bound by international consensus.
- Could lead to a more focused and strategic approach to international engagement, prioritizing bilateral relationships and agreements.
- May reduce exposure to international legal obligations and potential disputes.
Most Benefited Areas:
Potential Disadvantages
- Could weaken international cooperation on critical global issues such as climate change, environmental protection, and human rights.
- May damage the U.S.'s reputation and standing in the world, leading to reduced influence and diplomatic isolation.
- Could undermine the effectiveness of international efforts to address transnational challenges such as terrorism, pandemics, and economic instability.
- May create uncertainty and instability in international relations, as other countries reassess their relationships with the U.S.
- Could harm U.S. businesses and organizations that benefit from international collaboration and access to global markets.
Constitutional Alignment
The President cites their authority under the Constitution to direct executive departments and agencies. The Constitution grants the President significant authority in foreign affairs. Article II, Section 2, states that the President shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.
However, the extent of the President's power to unilaterally withdraw from treaties and international agreements without Senate approval is a subject of ongoing debate. The memorandum includes a general provisions section that states that it shall be implemented consistent with applicable law.
Impact Assessment: Things You Care About ⓘ
This action has been evaluated across 19 key areas that matter to you. Scores range from 1 (highly disadvantageous) to 5 (highly beneficial).